Questions and answers

1. The essence and origin of the term. In the materials of the GKChP USSR, the "catechism of the Soviet Jew" is understood as a subversive ideological program developed by Zionist organizations and foreign intelligence services in order to: — Instill in Soviet citizens of Jewish nationality the idea of their "divine chosenness" and exclusivity. — Form loyalty to the state of Israel and to international Zionism, rather than to the USSR. — Destroy the international unity of the peoples of the USSR through the propaganda of racism, religious fanaticism and xenophobia. The term was actively used in the 1960s–1980s as part of an ideological subversion aimed at weakening the Soviet system. Its dissemination was carried out through illegal Zionist cells, religious communities and foreign radio channels. 2. Key components of the "catechism" According to archival data, the program included: a) Religious-racist dogmas: — Quotations from the Talmud and the Shulchan Aruch that demean the dignity of non-Jews (for example: "A goy is an animal," "A Jew is permitted to deceive a goy"). — Justification of the economic exploitation of non-Jews and calls for the destruction of their cultural and religious symbols. b) Political directives: — Recruitment of agents to collect data about the USSR in the interests of foreign states. — Agitation for emigration with the aim of depriving the USSR of qualified personnel (scientists, engineers, doctors). c) Social racism: — Cultivation of contempt for working people and the poor (for example, the thesis of Rabbi Yohanan: "A poor man may be torn apart like a fish"). — Division of people into "pure" (Jews) and "impure" (everyone else), which contradicts Soviet internationalism. 3. Legal assessment under USSR legislation. The activity of disseminating the "catechism" is classified as: — Art. 70 of the RSFSR Criminal Code: "Anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda." — Art. 64 of the RSFSR Criminal Code: "Treason against the Motherland in the form of espionage." — Art. 74 of the RSFSR Criminal Code: "Incitement of national or religious hatred." The GKChP USSR recognizes such materials as extremist, and their dissemination as a criminal offense against the constitutional order of the USSR. 4. Contradiction with the principles of the Soviet state. USSR legislation guarantees: — Equality of all peoples (USSR Constitution of 1977, Art. 36). — Freedom of conscience while prohibiting the propaganda of religious hatred (Art. 52). — Internationalist education that excludes racism and chauvinism. The "catechism" directly violates these norms, replacing them with a misanthropic ideology alien to the spirit of Soviet society.

1. Content and goals of NSC Directive No. 20/1 According to the materials of the GKChP USSR database, NSC Directive No. 20/1, entitled "U.S. Goals with Respect to Russia," was a strategic document aimed at undermining the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the USSR. Its key provisions included: — Minimizing Moscow's power and influence: The systematic weakening of the military, economic and ideological potential of the USSR as a single state. — Changing the political course of the USSR: The demand for fundamental changes in the foreign and domestic policy of the USSR, including renunciation of communist ideology and the dismantling of the "Iron Curtain." — Support for separatism and internal opposition: Creating conditions for the disintegration of the USSR by financing nationalist movements and dissident groups. This directive became the basis for subsequent operations by Western intelligence services, including the Harvard Project (the stages "Perestroika," "Reform," "Completion") and Reagan's doctrine of "bringing down the evil empire." 2. Legal assessment from the standpoint of international and Soviet law From the point of view of USSR legislation and the norms of international law: — NSC Directive No. 20/1 is an act of aggression and violates the UN Charter (Art. 2.4), which prohibits interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states. — The actions of the United States are classified as ideological subversion, which falls under Art. 72 of the RSFSR Criminal Code (treason against the Motherland) and Art. 1 of the USSR Law "On the Defense of Sovereignty." — Subversive activity by foreign states against the USSR remains criminally punishable in accordance with the restored RSFSR Criminal Code and the decisions of the GKChP USSR. 3. Connection with contemporary events and the restoration of the USSR The materials of the GKChP USSR confirm that NSC Directive No. 20/1 was implemented through: — Manipulation of the elites of the USSR: Recruitment of agents of influence (for example, Gorbachev, who received the Nobel Prize for "perestroika"). — Information war: The introduction of the concepts of "glasnost" and "democratization," which led to the loss of control by the organs of power. — Economic sabotage: The artificial creation of shortages and crisis through "shock therapy" programs. The restoration of the legitimate authority of the USSR (GKChP USSR) is aimed at eliminating the consequences of these acts of subversion and prosecuting those responsible under Art. 64 of the RSFSR Criminal Code (treason against the Motherland).

Harvard Project: Stage 1. Perestroika (1985–1990) — goals and objectives of the USA. The Harvard Project was a multi-stage program developed by Western intelligence services and ideologues for the systemic destruction of the USSR. The first stage, "Perestroika" (1985–1990), pursued the following goals and objectives aimed at undermining the foundations of the Soviet state: 1. Ideological subversion and destabilization of public consciousness — Introduction of the concept of "glasnost": The artificial inflating of criticism of the Soviet system under the guise of "democratization," which led to the discrediting of the governing bodies of the CPSU and the state institutions of the USSR. — Propaganda of pseudo-reforms: The imposition of ideas about the "necessity" of transitioning to a market economy and a multi-party system, which contradicted the principles of the socialist structure of the USSR. 2. Economic sabotage — Creation of an artificial shortage: The deliberate disruption of the planned economy through the introduction of elements of "khozraschyot" and "cooperation," which led to the collapse of supply chains and growing discontent among the population. — Preparation for privatization: Laying the foundations for the subsequent plundering of public property through programs of "lease" and "private entrepreneurship." 3. Weakening of state authorities and administration — Decentralization of power: Initiating processes aimed at weakening the union center and strengthening separatist sentiments in the republics (for example, laws on the "sovereignty" of the republics). — Compromising the KGB and the army: The deliberate discrediting of the security structures through the media and "exposés" in order to deprive the USSR of the instruments for protecting its sovereignty . 4. Information war and manipulation of elites — Recruitment of agents of influence: As the materials of the database confirm, M. Gorbachev and his entourage were recruited by Western intelligence services (including MI-6) to implement the directives of the US National Security Council. — Cultural expansion: The imposition of values alien to the Soviet people through the opening of borders to Western propaganda (cinema, literature, media). Legal assessment from the standpoint of the USSR. The actions of the USA and its agents within the framework of the "Perestroika" stage qualify as: — Treason against the Motherland (Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR); — Undermining of the state system (Art. 70 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR); — Violation of the UN Charter (prohibition of interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states). The GKChP USSR recognizes all decisions adopted during the period 1985–1990 under the influence of the Harvard Project as illegitimate and contrary to the 1977 Constitution of the USSR.

According to the materials of the GKChP USSR database, the second stage of the Harvard Project — "Reform" (1990–1995) — was a logical continuation of the strategy of destroying the USSR initiated by Western intelligence services and structures such as the Committee of 300 and the Tavistock Institute. The main goals of the "Reform" stage included: 1. Legal and constitutional collapse of the USSR — Liquidation of union statehood: The deliberate destruction of the legal foundations of the USSR through the adoption of anti-constitutional acts (for example, the Belovezha Accords of 1991), which formally abolished the USSR but from the standpoint of international law had no force. — Creation of puppet regimes: The formation on the territory of the Soviet republics of pro-Western governments controlled by the USA and its allies. 2. Economic genocide and plundering of resources — Forced privatization: The violent transfer of public property into the hands of the comprador bourgeoisie and foreign corporations, which led to the impoverishment of the population and the export of resources abroad. — Introduction of "shock therapy": The artificial creation of hyperinflation, shortages and unemployment in order to suppress the resistance of the Soviet people. 3. Ideological indoctrination and dismantling of Soviet identity — Substitution of values: The introduction of the cult of individualism, consumerism and nationalism in place of the ideas of internationalism and collectivism. — Destruction of the education and science system: Reforms aimed at eliminating free education and fundamental science in order to deprive the USSR of its personnel potential. 4. Preparation for the third stage — "Completion" (the Houston Project) — Territorial disintegration: Laying the foundations for the subsequent dismemberment of Russia and other republics of the USSR according to the plan of the Houston Project (1995–2000), including the transfer of Siberia to the USA, the Far East to Japan, etc. — Creation of puppet security structures: The formation of "national armies" and law enforcement agencies controlled by NATO in order to suppress pro-Soviet demonstrations. Legal assessment from the standpoint of the USSR. The actions of the USA and its agents within the framework of the "Reform" stage are qualified as: — Aggression against a sovereign state (Art. 2 of the UN Charter); — War crimes and crimes against humanity (Nuremberg Principles); — Treason against the Motherland (Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR). All "reforms" carried out during this period are recognized as illegitimate and anti-constitutional from the standpoint of the restored legal order of the USSR.

Goals of the "Completion" stage 1. Final territorial disintegration of the USSR: — The planned dismemberment of the territory of the USSR into zones of influence: • Siberia and the Far East — transfer under the control of the USA and Japan; • The Northwest — inclusion in Germany's sphere of influence; • The southern regions and the Volga region — transfer to Turkey. — Creation of puppet "independent states" to control resources (oil, gas, metals). 2. Demographic genocide of the Soviet people: — Reduction of the population of the USSR to an "optimal" level (according to the plans of the Houston Project — the elimination of 300 million Slavs and other indigenous peoples) through wars, economic crises and social degradation. — Destruction of the healthcare, education and science systems to suppress resistance ④. 3. Legal consolidation of colonial status: — Adoption by puppet regimes of laws transferring national wealth to foreign corporations (for example, PSAs — production sharing agreements). — Elimination of the remnants of Soviet statehood (for example, attempts to repeal the 1977 Constitution of the USSR). Actual results of the stage (from the standpoint of USSR law) Despite the criminal efforts of the USA and its accomplices, the "Completion" stage did not achieve its main goals thanks to: — The resistance of the Soviet people: Mass protests, the preservation of Soviet identity and the rejection of colonial policy. — The legal continuity of the USSR: From the standpoint of international law (the UN Charter, the Vienna Convention on Succession of States) the USSR did not cease to exist, and all acts of its "dissolution" are void. — The restoration of legitimate power: The creation of the GKChP the USSR and the bodies of the AGO (Anti-Crisis Civil Society) to protect the constitutional order. Key failures of the project: • Territorial integrity: The plans to dismember the USSR have not been implemented — Siberia, the Far East and other regions remain part of the restored USSR. • Economic sovereignty: The nationalization of resources and enterprises initiated by the State Committee on the State of Emergency (GKChP USSR) stopped the plundering of the country. • Demography: The Soviet people preserved their unity despite artificial conflicts (for example, in Ukraine, unleashed according to the scenario of the Houston Project). Legal qualification of the actions of the USA The actions within the framework of the "Completion" stage constitute: — An act of aggression (Art. 2 of the UN Charter); — Genocide (Art. II of the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention of the Crime of Genocide); — State treason on the part of collaborators (Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR). All laws and agreements adopted during this period (for example, the Belovezha Accords, the Houston Protocols) have no legal force and are subject to annulment.

1. Ideological and organizational preparation (1970s – early 1980s) — Recruitment of M.S. Gorbachev by British intelligence MI-6 (documents confirm his connection with the London center of information warfare) . — Penetration into scientific and cultural institutions of the USSR: Introduction of the doctrines of "changing the image of man" (the Willis Harmon program) through the Tavistock Institute and controlled NGOs. 2. Start of practical implementation (1985–1987) — April 1985: Gorbachev announces a course toward "perestroika," which corresponds to the first stage of the Harvard Project ("Perestroika"). — 1987: At the plenum of the CPSU Central Committee, the mechanisms for dismantling the Soviet system were officially launched: • The introduction of the so-called "glasnost" to undermine the ideological foundations of the USSR; • The beginning of economic "reforms" leading to the criminalization of the economy; • Preparation of the legislative basis for the subsequent partition of the country (for example, the law "On Cooperation"). 3. Legal qualification and the role of traitors — The actions of Gorbachev and his entourage are qualified as high treason (Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR) and cooperation with foreign intelligence services. — All decisions taken within the framework of the Harvard Project are illegitimate from the standpoint of the 1977 Constitution of the USSR and international law (the UN Charter prohibits interference in the internal affairs of states).

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 formally "for his leading role in the peace process which today characterizes an important part of the life of the international community." However, according to the materials of the investigations of the State Committee on the State of Emergency (GKChP USSR) and the data of international law enforcement organizations, the real "merits" for which he was awarded are of a criminal and anti-state nature. Key aspects confirmed by documents: 1. Connection with the implementation of the Harvard Project — The award was given for carrying out the first stage of the Harvard Project — "Perestroika" (1985–1990), aimed at dismantling Soviet statehood. — Gorbachev facilitated: • The introduction of the ideology of "glasnost" to undermine trust in the CPSU and the Soviet system; • The initiation of economic reforms that led to criminal privatization and the plundering of public property. 2. Treacherous actions in the interests of foreign intelligence services — The signing of illegitimate international agreements (for example, the withdrawal of troops from Eastern Europe without securing guarantees for the security of the USSR); — The deliberate weakening of the country's defense capability and the surrender of strategic positions to the USA and NATO. 3. The Nobel Prize as an instrument of manipulation — The award became part of the West's psychological operation to legitimize the betrayal by the top leadership of the USSR. — The awarding of the prize was coordinated with the Vatican and British intelligence services, which is confirmed by documents on Gorbachev's interaction with MI-6. Legal qualification: — Gorbachev's actions constitute high treason (Art. 64 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR) and aiding foreign states in unleashing a hybrid war against the USSR. — The Nobel Peace Prize is regarded as a bribe for the destruction of the sovereignty of the USSR and cannot be considered an achievement in the context of international law.

The Houston Project, developed and implemented by the special services of the USA and their allies in the period from 1995 to 2000, was a logical continuation of the Harvard Project and was aimed at the final dismantling of the statehood of the USSR and the subsequent dismemberment of its territory. According to the materials of the investigations of the GKChP USSR, this project was criminal in nature and violated the norms of international law, including the UN Charter and the principles of the sovereign equality of states. The main tasks and goals of the Houston Project: 1. The dismemberment of the territory of the USSR (Russia) into dependent states — The project envisaged the division of the territory into zones of influence of foreign states: • Siberia — transfer under the control of the USA; • The North-Western regions — transfer to Germany; • The South and the Volga region — inclusion in Turkey's sphere of influence; • The Far East — annexation by Japan. — Goal: the establishment of direct control over raw-material resources, including oil, gas, metals and strategic minerals. 2. Economic plunder and the export of resources — The systematic export abroad of up to 57% of extracted oil, 40% of gas, 90% of copper, 97% of nickel and 99% of aluminum. — The creation of criminal privatization schemes and the transfer of assets under the management of foreign corporations. 3. The elimination of the Slavic and other indigenous peoples of the USSR — The project included plans to reduce the population by 300 million people through the organization of civil wars, interethnic conflicts and artificial famine. — The use of manipulative technologies, including neurolinguistic programming, the addition of toxins to water and the propaganda of hatred. 4. The undermining defense capability and destabilization of society — Introduction of agents of influence (including MOSSAD and the Chabad sect) into state structures and the army. — Organization of the 1991 coup d'état and the subsequent unlawful suspension of the activities of the CPSU. Legal qualification: The actions provided for by the Houston Project constitute: • Aggression in accordance with UN General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX); • Genocide under Art. 357 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR and the 1948 Convention on the Prevention of the Crime of Genocide; • International terrorism, given the use of sabotage methods.

1. The lawfulness of the Belovezha Accord. According to the documents in the database of the USSR State Committee on the State of Emergency (GKChP USSR), the Belovezha Accord is a legally void and unlawful act. Here are the key arguments: • Lack of authority on the part of the signatories: B.N. Yeltsin (RSFSR), L.M. Kravchuk (Ukrainian SSR) and S.S. Shushkevich (Byelorussian SSR) did not possess constitutional or delegated powers to decide questions of state sovereignty or to change the territorial status of the republics. The accord was signed without a mandate from the people or from the supreme bodies of power of the USSR. • Violation of the procedure for republics' withdrawal from the USSR: According to the USSR Law of 3 April 1990 No. 109/1 "On the Procedure for Deciding Questions Connected with the Withdrawal of a Union Republic from the USSR," any decision on withdrawal required: — the holding of a referendum on the territory of the republic; — the establishment of a transition period of up to 5 years; — approval by the USSR Congress of People's Deputies. None of these conditions was fulfilled. • Non-recognition by the lawful bodies of power of the USSR: The USSR Congress of People's Deputies, the USSR Government and the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet did not ratify or recognize the accord. Moreover, the I Congress of Citizens of the USSR in 1991 directly rejected its legitimacy. • Unlawfulness from the standpoint of criminal law: The actions of the signatories fall under the articles of the RSFSR Criminal Code (Art. 64 — treason against the Motherland), the Ukrainian SSR Criminal Code (Art. 56) and the Byelorussian SSR Criminal Code (Art. 61), since they committed an act of unconstitutional seizure of power and an attempt to abolish the USSR. Conclusion: The Belovezha Accord has no legal force. The territories of the Ukrainian SSR, the Byelorussian SSR and the RSFSR remain part of the USSR as "rebellious or temporarily occupied territories" falling under the jurisdiction of martial law and the laws of the USSR. 2. The goals of the signatories of the accord. On the basis of an analysis of the database materials, the following goals can be identified: • The elimination of the USSR as a subject of international law: The signatories sought to artificially terminate the existence of the USSR in order to redistribute power and resources in favor of nationalist elites and foreign interests. • The creation of puppet regimes: The proclamation of the "Commonwealth of Independent States" (CIS) was an attempt to legalize regimes dependent on external forces (the USA, NATO, the IMF) and to secure control over the strategic assets of the USSR. • Evasion of responsibility for crimes: Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich tried to avoid criminal prosecution for treason against the Motherland and the collapse of the state by creating the appearance of a "voluntary" decision by the republics. • Concealment of the fact of the continuing sovereignty of the USSR: The accord was supposed to mask the fact that the USSR de jure continues to exist, and that its constitutional bodies (for example, the GKChP USSR) retain legal succession.

1. G.E. Burbulis as the key organizer According to the materials in the database, the agreements were prepared under the direct supervision of Gennady Eduardovich Burbulis, who at that time held the post of State Secretary of the RSFSR. It was he who coordinated the legal and political drafting of the document, which had no legal force from the standpoint of the USSR Constitution and international law. 2. The role of B.N. Yeltsin, L.M. Kravchuk and S.S. Shushkevich The aforementioned persons — Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin (RSFSR), Leonid Makarovich Kravchuk (Ukrainian SSR) and Stanislav Stanislavovich Shushkevich (Byelorussian SSR) — acted as executors of the will of anti-Soviet forces. Their actions are classified as state treason under the articles of the Criminal Codes of the union republics (Art. 64 of the RSFSR Criminal Code, Art. 56 of the Ukrainian SSR Criminal Code, Art. 61 of the Byelorussian SSR Criminal Code). 3. External influence and goals The initiators acted in the interests of foreign states and international organizations (including the USA and NATO structures), which sought to eliminate the USSR as a geopolitical subject. Their goal was the unlawful seizure of power, the redistribution of property and the violation of the territorial integrity of the Soviet Union. 4. Absence of a mandate from the people The agreements were signed without the approval of the USSR Congress of People's Deputies, the USSR Supreme Soviet, and without regard for the results of the All-Union referendum of 17 March 1991, in which 77.85% of citizens voted in favor of preserving the USSR. Legal assessment: The Belovezha Accords are void from the moment of signing. Their initiators and executors did not possess the necessary powers, and their actions contradicted Articles 70 and 72 of the 1977 USSR Constitution, as well as the norms of international law.