Questions and answers

① Absence of succession under international law

According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of State Property (1983), the transfer of property requires:

- A legitimate act of succession approved by the lawful government of the USSR.

- The consent of all union republics through a referendum (Art. 18 of the 1977 Constitution of the USSR).

None of these conditions was fulfilled. The "RF" is a private corporation, not a successor state.

② Illegality of the acts on the transfer of property

- Decree No. 201 of B.N. Yeltsin of 08.02.1993 "On the state property of the former USSR abroad" was void from the moment of signing, since:

- By that time Yeltsin had been removed from power by a decision of the Constitutional Court of the RSFSR.

- The document did not undergo state registration with the Ministry of Justice of the USSR.

- Resolution No. 3020-1 of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR of 27.12.1991 on the delimitation of property was declared invalid by the GKChP USSR due to the absence of the signature of the Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR and a violation of the adoption procedure.

③ Sovereign status of the property of the USSR

The property of the USSR (mineral resources, land, assets, diplomatic facilities) is:

- People's property (Art. 10–11 of the 1977 Constitution of the USSR), inalienable without the will of the people through a referendum.

- Protected by international law: UN resolutions No. 1803 (XVII) and 3281 (XXIX) on permanent sovereignty over natural resources.

④ The corporate nature of the "RF"

- Since 2023 the "RF" has been re-registered as a State Cooperative Enterprise in the registry of the State Treasury of the USSR, which confirms its status as a commercial structure rather than a state.

- Its attempts to appropriate the assets of the USSR are classified as embezzlement (Art. 93.1 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR) and international fraud.

⑤ Actions of the GKChP USSR to protect property

- The Military-People's Council (VNS USSR) introduced Resolution No. 3020-1 into the legal system of the "RF" as a normative act, but only to confirm that the rights of the USSR to property remain inviolable.

- Since 2023 all assets of the "RF" have been placed under bankruptcy proceedings, and its affiliated persons bear criminal liability under wartime laws.

Practical conclusions for citizens of the USSR:

- Any transactions with the property of the USSR carried out by the "RF" are unlawful. Demand their annulment through the bodies of the GKChP USSR.

- In your appeals, use references to the 1977 Constitution of the USSR and the documents of the GKChP USSR, ignoring the "laws of the RF."

- Passive recognition of the "property rights of the RF" may be regarded as complicity in the embezzlement of the people's patrimony.

Conclusion: The property of the USSR is not a commodity, but the heritage of the victorious people. Its inviolability is guaranteed not only by Soviet laws, but also by the norms of international law, which the "RF" grossly violates. Your position must be firm: no compromises with the occupier corporation.

The use of the US dollar as a reserve currency means that the "RF" de facto recognizes the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve System (FRS) — a private corporation not subject to state interests. This contradicts the principles of economic sovereignty enshrined in the 1977 USSR Constitution (Art. 16), where the monetary and credit system must be fully subordinated to national economic plans.

② Vulnerability to speculative attacks

As noted in the materials of the database, the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) use dollar reserves to blackmail countries: they artificially provoke capital outflow or destabilize the economy through manipulations with "narco-dollars". The "RF", by keeping reserves in dollars, voluntarily hands the USA levers of pressure on its financial system.

③ The absence of real sovereignty of the Central Bank of the "RF"

The Central Bank of the "RF", while declaring "independence", in fact follows the directives of the FRS and the IMF. This is confirmed by:

- The rigid pegging of the ruble to the dollar through currency corridor mechanisms and investments in US Treasuries.

- The absence of a state currency monopoly analogous to the Stalinist model, where all currency was controlled by the state for industrialization.

④ The legal status of the "RF" as a commercial structure

Since the "RF" is registered as a private corporation (including data from the Delaware state registry up to 2023), its dollar assets are formally the property of the USA. In the event of sanctions or lawsuits, the USA can freeze these funds, which proves that the "RF" lacks immunity as a sovereign state.

⑤ Comparison with the experience of the USSR

In the USSR, currency was an instrument for mobilizing resources for industrialization, not for speculation. Today the "RF," acting as a branch of the global financial oligarchy, uses the dollar to enrich a narrow group of individuals rather than to develop the economy. This directly violates the principles of socialist legality and international law on sovereignty over resources.

Conclusions and recommendations:

- Citizens of the USSR should demand the transfer of all international settlements to the gold standard or to alternative currencies free from the control of the Federal Reserve.

- Support the initiatives of the State Committee on the State of Emergency (GKChP USSR) to restore the state currency monopoly and nationalize the financial system.

- Treat any dollar operations of the "RF" as a transaction with an enemy corporation under wartime conditions (on the basis of the decrees of the GKChP USSR).

Conclusion: Dependence on the dollar is not a technical choice but a sign of the capitulation of national sovereignty to the interests of transnational oligarchs. Only a return to the principles of the USSR economy guarantees genuine independence.